Archive for the ‘Revision Surgery’ Category

INTERNAL HERNIAS RELATED TO A GASTRIC BYPASS

Thursday, January 12th, 2012

INTERNAL HERNIAS RELATED TO A GASTRIC BYPASS

 

The internal hernias after a Laparoscopic Gastric Bypass may occur in 10 % of patients.  Early detection is important because they threaten the patient by causing intestinal obstruction, intestinal strangulation with perforation and peritonitis.

It is very important to know that the Internal hernias often pass unnoticed delaying the diagnosis and the treatment. 

The doctors either do not suspect the problem as a cause of the symptoms or the patients misunderstand the severity of their symptoms due to their initially vague clinical symptoms.

It is very common that the patients tend self medicate themselves delaying the prompt attention, not consulting with a doctor until symptoms are more serious with a higher risk of catastrophic complications.

Internal hernias in patients with Gastric Bypass occur most frequently 18 months after surgery, however there are reports from the first postoperative day up to 25 years after the operation.

It is important to know if your doctor completed a laparoscopic Gastric Bypassretro colic” or gastric Bypass “ante colic”.

There are 3 sites in the first case (retro colic) where hernia occurs: At the Petersen’s space, at level the jejunum-jejunostomy and at the mesocolon underneath the transverse colon; and there are two sites in the ante colic laparoscopic Gastric Bypass with a potential internal hernia presentation.

When a surgeon uses sutures during the bypass surgery the potential of a hernia space decrease the risk of the presentation of internal hernia.

In some private hospitals operatory time is very expensive and some doctors prefer to ignore this very important surgical step, on the other hand, to close these spaces also requires the development of advanced laparoscopic skills to do it correctly and in expeditious manner with intracorporeal stitches to close such potential hernia spaces and that has to be done by hand (not staplers), as a result, that explains some of the incidence of hernia with intestinal obstruction.

Common symptoms of internal hernia after a Laparoscopic Gastric Bypass are mild peri umbilical pain progressing to an intermittently cramping pain but increases in frequency and if not treated it will progress to the classic intestinal obstruction.

Occasionally the intestinal obstruction is mild and resolves quickly but may become a true surgical emergency where the life of the patient is at risk and surgical laparoscopic treatment has to be done without delay.

If you experience any of the described symptoms you must act quickly to resolve the hernia and need to be explore the area by laparoscopic means.  Closure of the hernia ring is very feasible in most cases, even more, when a bypass patient arrives with obstruction and it is diagnosed quickly needs to undergoing laparoscopic exploration to avoid complications.  If not treated immediately the chances increase due to the high possibility of a second catastrophic event.

Don’t expect that the hernia will be resolved with general measures because sooner or later the patient’s life is in jeopardy.

Dr. Arturo Rodriguez

Gastric Surgery and Obesity

http://www.thebariatric.com

http://www.bandstersforum.com

Originally posted 2010-01-10 19:59:05. Republished by Blog Post Promoter

Did you like this? If so, please bookmark it,
tell a friend
about it, and subscribe to the blog RSS feed.

The Answers to Gastric Sleeve Failures

Thursday, January 5th, 2012

The Answers to Gastric Sleeve Failures

The Gastric Sleeve is an open procedure, and is known as part of the Duodenal Switch since 1988.  The Laparoscopic Gastric Sleeve on high risk patients started in 2004 as the first stage of the Duodenal Switch (DS) and soon after that date, several teams started Laparoscopic Gastric Sleeve programs as primary or solitary surgical procedures for morbidly obese patients. In 2007 the Gastric Sleeve was proposed as a treatment for Metabolic Disease regardless of the excess weight of the patient. 

There are no long term follow-up results currently available for Gastric Sleeve Patients as a primary procedure. However, due to the increasing popularity of the Laparoscopic Sleeve, we are starting to see an increased number of failures. What we have observed in most of the Gastric Sleeve failures is the presence of large stomachs or large sleeves instead of a small volume sleeve. We have also observed a very poor nutritional and dietary change of habits in patients exhibiting gastric sleeve failure .

gastric-sleeve-proper-size   = CLICK VIDEO

When we started performing Lap Band Procedures we were creating 50 cc pouches; soon after started creating 15 cc pouches in order to give patients restriction and to avoid failures.  We are experiencing similar conditions with the Gastric Sleeve.  The remaining stomach is too large (large sleeve) so patients don’t have adequate restriction to lose weight as we expected. The use of a smaller bougie during surgery to calibrate the size of the sleeve is imperative to avoid such technical failures. The running suture reinforcement will also help to prevent a large stretching of the sleeve.

When we started performing Gastric Sleeves we didn’t have enough appropriate follow-up care for patients because we were assuming the sleeve will work and do its job (by creating enough restriction and decreasing the Ghrelin levels to lower  hunger). The truth is that patients need to be monitored closely and assisted on a regular basis with support groups and counseling in order to succeed.

We believe that the stretching of the Sleeve over time will also play a huge role in all of the cases of failure just as we learned from the lap band. Dilated pouches (large pouches) played a huge role in Lap Band failure in the past, and now in the case of the Gastric Sleeve, failure is due primarily to a large stomach pouch or sleeve.

Arturo Rodríguez, MD

http://www.thebariatric.com

http://www.bandstersforum.com

Originally posted 2008-09-11 19:41:17. Republished by Blog Post Promoter

Did you like this? If so, please bookmark it,
tell a friend
about it, and subscribe to the blog RSS feed.

Lap Band Leaks: What You Should Know

Thursday, November 3rd, 2011

Lap Band Leaks: What You Should Know

A Lapband leak is suspected when a patient that previously had adequate restriction feels a change in the amount of restriction. This can happen suddenly or over a period of time, depending on the size of the leak. If there is a leak of the lap band, the band will not be able to be adequately filled and will not provide restriction, or function properly.  There are four types of lapband leaks that can occur to the lapband once it is placed, based on the location: (1) Leaks at the lapband balloon, (2) Leaks at the lapband tube connections, (3) Leaks at the body of the tube, and (4) Port membrane leaks.

(1) Leaks at the Lapband Balloon

Leaks in the lap band balloon can be unintentionally caused by needle punctures during surgery, or may occur over time in certain factory weak points of the balloon.

figure-101

Leak at Lapband balloon http://www.thebariatric.com

Figure 1.0  In the figure above, you can see the lap band (white rectangular shape), which has been filled with contrast fluid.  The arrow points to a small amount of fluid that has moved outside the band from a small leak in the balloon of the lap band (VG).   

Lapband Leak

Lap-Band Leak http://www.thebariatric.com

Figure 1.1 This is another image of a lap band balloon leak.  A thin line of contrast fluid can be seen outside of the lap band, surrounding both the band and the tube.

Lapband Leak

Lapband Leak http://www.thebariatric.com

 Figure 1.2 The lap band balloon can be seen in the centre of this image (rectangular shape, slanted to the left). In this case, there is a larger leak of contrast fluid which is more easily visible around the lap band balloon (arrow).

figure-13

Lapband leak seen during surgery http://www.thebariatric.com

Figure 1.3 In this case, there was a leak in the lap band balloon, and surgery was required to remove the band.  During surgery, the leak was very clearly seen when fluid was pushed through the lap band, to reveal the location of the leak.  (The arrow points to the line of fluid leaking from the  AMI band). 

(2) Leaks at the Lapband Tube Connection

Leaks can occur within the Lapband tube connection if there is a break or fracture of the tube next to the metal connector. Breaks or fractures may be due to physical movement over time, when considering the materials of the connections (metal and silicone).   If the “fracture” is complete, it can be easily diagnosed with an x-ray film (plain film), without needing to inject contrast fluid. 

figure-20

Lapband plain x-ray film http://www.thebariatric.com

 Figure 2.0 Above, we can see the lapband port in the lower, right corner, with the tube extending to the left in the x-ray image.  There is a complete fracture (break) in the tube.  The distal end of the tube is near the port, which means the tube may still be in the abdominal wall.

Lapband leak

Lapband Leak http://www.thebariatric.com

Figure 2.1 Above, we can see the lapband port near the bottom of the x-ray image, with a complete fracture (break) in the tube, which is curled up at the top of the image.  This shows that the tube is likely still inside the abdominal cavity.

figure-22

Port of a Lapband leak http://www.thebariatric.com

Figure 2.2 Above is a photo of the lapband port that was removed during surgery from Figure 2.1. 

 If the “fracture” is incomplete, it is necessary to inject contrast inside the system in order to diagnosis the problem.

figure-23

Figure 2.3 This shows an incomplete fracture, with the tube in place.

figure-24

Port of a Lapband leak http://www.thebariatric.com

 

Figure 2.4 This is the port removed from the above case (Figure 2.3).

l

Port of a Lapband leak http://www.thebariatric.com

 Figure 2.5 In this plain x-ray film, the port can be seen in the bottom right corner. There is a slight bend in the tube at the connection point (upper right corner of the film).

lapband leak

 Figure 2.6  As a leak was suspected, contrast fluid was passed through this lapband port.  A large amount of contrast fluid is seen at the bend, in the top right (the connection point).

In some cases, it is not possible to indentify a leak with x-rays. Therefore, the diagnosis of a leak may need to be done at the time of surgery.

Lapband leak

Lap-Band Leak http://www.thebariatric.com

Figure 2.7 In this x-ray with contrast fluid, there is no evidence of a leak.

Tube leak near the port

Tube leak near the port http://www.thebariatric.com

Figure 2.8 This leak was not demonstrated with x-rays.  As the leak was suspected, surgery was required to find the location of the leak.

(3) Leaks at the Body of the Tube

These lap band leaks are usually iatrogenic. This means that the leak was caused by an unintentional needle puncture, during a fill that was done without using fluoroscopy to guide the needle. These kinds of leaks are very common in office fills. Even in the best hands, there is always a risk of puncturing the tube during a lap band adjustment. This is one of the reasons that we always recommend fills to be done under fluoroscopy.

Lapband tube puncture

Lapband tube puncture http://www.thebariatric.com

  Figure 3.0  A leak can be seen in the body of the tube, close to the connection. This leak was made with a needle at the time of an adjustment (office fill).

Lapband tube puncture

Lap-band Tube puncture http://www.thebariatric.com

Figure 3.1  The leaking portion of the tube was removed during surgery.

(4) Port Membrane Leaks

This type of leak usually occurs when the patient has received many fills, or when the adjustment was done using a standard needle. Only Huber (non-coring) needles (Figure 4.2) should be used to perform fills or adjustments.  The silicone membrane of the port may be damaged if any other type of needle is used.

figure-40

Lap-band Port Leak http://www.thebariatric.com


      Figure 4.0 The lapband leak is just in front of the port, where contrast can be seen.     

Port Membrane Leak

Lap-band Port Membrane Leak http://www.thebariatric.com

Huber Needle

Huber Needle http://www.thebariatric.com

 Figure 4.1 During surgery, we can see a leak at the port membrane as seen by the bubbles that are produced when the port is placed in water.                                

Figure 4.2 Huber (non-coring) needle.

Final Thoughts

Every day, the lap band manufacturers are improving the design and functionality of the gastric bands in order to prevent complications such as leaks. However, there is always a small risk of leaks over time. Many types of lap band leaks can be avoided by careful handelling the gastric band at the time of the surgery and by doing the lap band fill or adjustment under the fluoroscopy guide, and finally by using the right non-core  needle. 

Arturo Rodriguez, MD
Bariatric Surgeon
Susana González, MD
Radiologist
http://www.thebariatric.com

Originally posted 2009-03-07 23:31:38. Republished by Blog Post Promoter

Did you like this? If so, please bookmark it,
tell a friend
about it, and subscribe to the blog RSS feed.

Lapband Slippage: Causes & Prevention

Thursday, October 20th, 2011

Lapband Slippage: Causes & Prevention

A Clinical Study

A clinical study was done in Germany to review complications following lap band surgery. Thirty-five hospitals were involved in the study, with 4138 patients that underwent gastric banding over a five-year period.  Lap Band long-term complications were described in 8.6%  of all patients.  The most common complications included: pouch dilation or enlargement (5.0%), lap band slippage (2.6%), and Lapband migration or erosion (1.0%). (Stroh,C  Manger, T “Complications after adjustable gastric banding”, Chirurg, 2006, Vol 77,pag 244-250)

Normal Lapband x-ray

Normal Lap Band X-Ray Under Fluoroscopy

lapband-enlarged-pouch

Enlarged Lap Band Pouch

What is Lap Band Slippage?

One of the long-term complications of lap band surgery is called “Lapband slippage” and can be defined as “when the Lapband and the stomach pouch are both prolapsed.”  This means that the lap band has shifted position and the enlarged stomach pouch has also shifted or twisted so that food does not go through the lapband into the rest of the stomach. This may result in pain, discomfort, decreased appetite and inability to eat or drink, and vomiting. Lapband Slippage does not happen immediately but may take several months to develop.

Huge-lapband-pouch

Large Lap Band Pouch

Lap Band Slippage generally develops in a progressive manner. As food intake is increased, the stomach begins to stretch and grow and the patient may stop losing weight or start to regain weight.  At this point, patients may only exhibit an enlarged stomach Lap band pouch.  This can be medically treated by deflating the lap band to release pressure and slow the growth of the pouch (successful in 70% of cases, or surgical treatment can be considered). However, if the enlarged lapband pouch continues to grow, the lapband progressively rotates until both the lap band and the enlarged pouch become prolapsed, resulting in Lap band slippage.  This is followed by functional stenosis (narrowing) of the stomach.

lapband-slippage

Lap Band Slippage

Lapband Slippage Symptoms typically include progressively worsening reflux, vomiting and epigastric complaints, which may increase to sudden near-total dysphagia (inability to swallow or eat anything, including saliva).

Risk factors or causes of lap band slippage include surgical technique, model of the  lapband used, early consumption of solid foods, early inflation or filling of the band, consumption of carbonated or sparkling beverages, and frequent vomiting.

Treatment for lap band slippage requires surgical intervention. The lapband must be repositioned or removed, based on the operative findings and condition of the stomach pouch. If appropriate, the surgeon and patient may elect to choose another type of bariatric procedure such as a Gastric Sleeve.

How Do I Prevent Lap Band Slippage?

In order to decrease the risk of developing lap band slippage, it is important to follow the recommended diet following surgery and to avoid introducing solid foods too early.  In addition, the fills should not be started before 6 weeks post-operatively and these Lap band fills should be very gradual.  We also recommend that fills should be done under fluoroscopy, even if you are asymptomatic (no symptoms of lap band slippage), to be able to monitor the position of the lapband, and the size of the stomach pouch and condition of the esophagus. This will allow for early diagnosis of an enlarged stomach pouch or possible lap band slippage.

Susana González, MD

Radiologist

http://www.thebariatric.com

Originally posted 2009-02-17 13:25:15. Republished by Blog Post Promoter

Did you like this? If so, please bookmark it,
tell a friend
about it, and subscribe to the blog RSS feed.

My Surgery Story–De-Banding and Gastric Sleeve

Wednesday, September 28th, 2011

Subject: My surgery story -  de-banding and gastric sleeve   21/08/09

Gastric Sleeve

Gastric Sleeve

 

 

 


I just got back from Mexico, where Dr. Arturo Rodriguez performed the gastric sleeve surgery for me. (Warning… long post coming up!)Four years ago tomorrow, I had the Lap-Band surgery with Dr. Rodriguez.For a variety of reasons, the band didn’t work for me. I did manage to lose

about 40 pounds with the Lap-Band surgery, so the surgery was not

a failure, but I never did get good restriction. It seemed like I ran into

roadblock after roadblock, and I had a heck of a time trying to get good

follow up care in my community. My life changed over the past 4 years,

making it impossible for me to travel and be away from home to do fills,

so follow up care in Mexico wasn’t an option for me. I recently became

a midwife, attending women at homebirths, so taking time away from my

clients is not something I can do easily. Finally, a couple of months ago,

I decided to have my band removed and have the gastric sleeve done.

My best friend and I traveled to Mexico together and, of course, received

top quality service from Dr. Rodriguez and his staff. Once we got to the

hotel, we had a quick meal and a few margaritas before I had to begin my

pre-operative fast.

The next morning, the driver picked us up at the hotel and took us to Hospital

San Pedro. I had been there before for my Lap-Band surgery and my port

relocation surgery, so it was a familiar place for me. Shortly after I arrived,

the nurses took me back for my IV, weight check, vitals, labs, etc. Oh, and

by the way, since I work in the medical field, I took great note of their attention

to cleanliness and clean technique — no worries there (in case anyone

wonders about that). After the nurses were done, the anesthesiologist came

to visit me, as did Dr. Rodriguez. Next, I was wheeled into the operating room.

I got on the operating table, and the anesthesiologist put a mask over me.

The next thing I remember is waking up in recovery afterwards. I was SORE

and groggy, and I thought, “what have I done???”

Dr. Rodriguez had to work really hard on me during my surgery. De-banding

is not an easy task, and there were a lot of adhesions he had to remove. Also,

since I was previously banded, Dr. Rodriguez was very careful to make sure I

didn’t have any erosion, which could have caused life-threatening complications.

He also took extra care to be sure that the staple line in my stomach was

reinforced by sutures, and shot blue dye through my stomach to be sure

that there were no leaks. I am so thankful for Dr. Rodriguez’s skill as a surgeon.

I have trusted him with my life twice now, and I truly believe he is an outstanding

doctor. I would recommend him to anyone considering gastric surgery.

HE IS THE BEST!!!

Dr. Rodriguez had arranged for my friend and me to stay at the big suite at San

Pedro, which, by the way, happens to be a birthing room where they do

water births — my kind of place! The room had two hospital beds, two sofas,

several chairs, a kitchen, and a bathroom. It was extremely comfortable and lovely.

I am so thankful to Dr. Rodriguez for arranging for us to stay there!!!

OK, I’m being totally honest… the first day was hell. My throat was sore from

the tube being in there during the surgery. I threw up several times, was in pain,

and was really worried that I had made a bad decision. My back and arms

hurt a lot from being on the surgical table. I could barely move. Every movement

felt like torture. The pain meds gave me a horrible headache.

Second day was better, but it was still rough. I was throwing up less often and

was drinking sips of water. Still very sore, but doing better. On the third day,

Dr. Rodriguez was concerned about my difficulties with drinking, so he arranged

for me to have a barium swallow to make sure there wasn’t an obstruction.

Everything checked out OK, so he sent me to the hotel to recuperate. Day 4 was

spent just sipping water and Riopan, and there was no more throwing up. Late

that day, Dr. Rodriguez met us at the hospital to have my drain removed. THAT

was a really weird feeling! Once the drain was out, my soreness improved greatly.

One thing I found REALLY helpful in getting liquids down was I got some honey

straws. I discovered by accident that these work really well. If you have trouble

getting liquids down, it helps to just swallow, swallow, swallow until it moves down.

Well, with the honey straws, you have to work really hard to suck the honey out,

and that action, combined with the swallowing of the little bits of honey, works really

well in propelling the food downward. If you’re getting gastric sleeve surgery,

I suggest picking up a box of these to take with you to Mexico. My friend found

some at the plaza in Monterrey, but I’ve seen them at Target in the tea section

here in the US.

Day 5, we left the hotel and headed home. My advice to anyone traveling after

this procedure – GET A WHEELCHAIR! If you have a wheelchair, you will breeze

through customs and security and life will be a whole lot easier for you.

I’ve been home now for three days and I feel much better. I am able to drink about

60 ounces of water a day now, which is about half of what I used to drink, but it is

improving daily. I am not as sore as I was, but I’m still hurting a bit. My surgical

wounds are healing nicely, and I’m starting to feel more “normal” again. I’ve lost

12 pounds in this first week, which is also pretty cool. I’ve been drinking Vitamin Water,

chicken broth, and Italian ices. Dr. Rodriguez says I am to have clear liquids for 3 weeks,

and then full liquids for 3 months. Most people would think that would be hard,

but so far, I have absolutely no desire for food and do not feel hungry at all. I have

to really force myself to drink enough to stay hydrated, so that’s my toughest

work at the moment.

Anyway, I hope to hear more from people who have had the Gastric Sleeve.

I hope this post is helpful to any of you out there thinking about having it done.

Blessings,

Kim Pekin
Midwife
Purcellville, VA
www.gentlehomebirth.com

Originally posted 2009-09-22 21:17:25. Republished by Blog Post Promoter

Did you like this? If so, please bookmark it,
tell a friend
about it, and subscribe to the blog RSS feed.

Why My Weight Loss Procedure Can Fail?

Wednesday, September 14th, 2011

Why My Weight Loss Procedure Can Fail?

The first and most important step to minimize the chances of failure from a Bariatric procedure and to increase your success rate is to be well informed about each one of the surgeries before you choose any of them.

What should you know about Weight Loss Surgery?

  • How does each procedure work? How will they assist in weight loss?
  • What should you expect from the Lap Band, Gastric Sleeve, or Gastric Bypass procedures, in terms of weight loss and/or Type 2 Diabetes
  • The difference in short and long-term benefits for each procedure
  • The operative risks and complication rates for each procedure
  • How much follow-up and support will you need for each procedure
  • How much of the Total Patient Care (TPC) program services will you need
  • What kind of adjustments will you need following surgery?
  • What kind of commitment is expected from you, for each procedure
  • What should you expect from the Doctor or Bariatric Group that you choose
  • The surgical options you have for each of the procedures in case of a failure
  • Finally, the cost of each procedure

What should you know about the Doctor or Bariatric Group?

You have to be well informed about the Doctors and medical team performing the Lap Band, the Gastric Sleeve or the Gastric Bypass.  Choose your surgeon and medical team wisely in order to ensure the best results for your weight loss success.

  • Ask about their education and training credentials if you are planning to go to a Latin Country. Look for Medical Degrees in Private Colleges like Monterrey Tech, University of Monterrey, or LaSalle School of Medicine, or other reputable medical universities.
  • Ask about where they received their Surgical Training. There can be a big difference in the treatment you will receive between doctors trained in well-known Private Hospitals, rather than in the Social Governmental Health Care System.
  • Ask about their Diplomas. Did they have to write a Medical Tests to join the Medical Society or Surgeon group, or did they just pay a subscription fee to become a member?
  • Check the number of Revision Surgeries they have been involved with. This may give you an indication of the quality of their work.
  • Check their Surgical Staff for credentials and experience. Consider the Anesthesiologist and any other assistant surgeons. It is important that they have experience in Bariatric surgery.
  • Double-check the Ethics and Professionalism of their Promoters or Coordinators.
  • Finally, check the Follow Up and Support they would provide you after your surgery.

Diet Rules to Follow (Regardless of the Weight Loss Procedure you Choose)

For any weight loss method to be successful and effective, you have to make some healthy lifestyle choices regarding the foods that you eat.  Bariatric surgery is an effective way to increase the rate of weight loss, but the best results can only happen when you make healthy choices.  After Bariatric surgery, you will feel full with a smaller amount of food – make sure to choose foods with the most nutritional value to help you on the journey to a new, healthier you!

  • Follow the Diet Steps recommended by your Doctor or the Nutritionist after surgery.
  • Chewing very well will help to maintain the pouch size, preventing stomach stretching and decreasing the risk of blockages and reflux in the esophagus or stomach.
  • Eat 6 small meals a day.
  • Eat slowly; take your time at the table.
  • Preferably, hydrate or drink beverages between meals.
  • Avoid Gastric Irritants like Alcohol, Coffee, Hot or Spicy, Vinegar, Soy Sauce or other Acid Beverages.
  • Limit high calorie foods like chocolate, cream and full-fat dairy products.

Failure Features Characteristically observed with Bariatric Procedures

These “failures” can be a result of a number of different circumstances or actions, or may develop slowly over time.  Therefore, it is important to have regular follow-ups to monitor your weight loss and the status of your lap band, sleeve or gastric pouch.  Remember: If you have any concerns, don’t be afraid to ask your doctor.

  • Big Gastric Pouches
  • Mega- esophagus
  • Wide Gastric Sleeve
  • Excessive tightness of the Gastric Band
  • Wide outlet of the Bypass Gastro-Yeyuno
  • Very Short common limb of the Gastric Bypass

 

Arturo Rodríguez, MD

http://www.thebariatric.com

Originally posted 2008-07-10 23:25:31. Republished by Blog Post Promoter

Did you like this? If so, please bookmark it,
tell a friend
about it, and subscribe to the blog RSS feed.

Old Treatments For Weight Loss Are New For Diabetes

Wednesday, August 10th, 2011

Old Treatments for Weight Loss are New for Diabetes

Approximately 22% of adults in the United States and 35% of the adults in Mexico have been diagnosed with Type 2 Diabetes, which is the type that also accounts for 95% of all Diabetes cases.  About 60% of obese patients have Metabolic Syndrome (Type 2 Diabetes, High Blood Pressure and High Cholesterol) and 20% of people over 65 years are Diabetic in the US.  With an estimated over 300 million affected individuals by 2025, the lifetime risk of developing type 2 Diabetes will approximate 20%.

There is an increased interest world-wide for surgical procedures that improve Type 2 Diabetes and Metabolic Syndrome.  Many Bariatric or Weight Loss Surgeons are asked about their experience in this matter for the better understanding and treatment of this disease.  We now know after years of Gastrointestinal Weight Loss procedures, that there are two main effects achieved through bariatric surgery: one is the Bariatric Effect (successful weight loss), and the second is the Metabolic Effect (a positive change in features of Metabolic Syndrome).

People that are overweight or obese will see improvement in blood sugar levels when they lose weight. Except with the Gastric Band, other gastrointestinal weight loss procedures (Gastric Bypass, Duodenal Bypass, Gastric Sleeve, Duodenal Switch or Bilio-Pancreatic Diversion) can promote an improvement in blood sugar levels long before there is significant weight loss.  Often the improvement can be seen just days after the surgery.

Improvement of blood sugar levels for people with type 2 Diabetes can be very successful for those that receive the Gastric Band (50% of the cases), the Gastric Bypass (70%), the Gastric Sleeve (85%) or the Duodenal Exclusion Procedures with or without Sleeve (92%). Patients that need insulin, and those that have been Diabetic for a longer period of time, are more resistant to blood sugar improvements.  However, the gastric procedures have still been shown to help these patients.

There are different explanations about the Metabolic Effect.  In the gastric bypass, this effect is related to the nature of the malabsortive procedures. The Duodenal exclusion is related to the secretion changes of the Ghrelin Factor (Hunger Factor) and other Neuro-hormonal factors called Incretins as the GIP (gastric inhibitory peptide), GLP-1 (glucagon like peptide) and the YY peptide. In operated patients where the stomach and the duodenum are excluded, the increase in Incretin secretion has a direct effect on lowering the Sugar Insulin Resistance, promoting the Growth of the BETA Pancreatic Cells that produces insulin and also for the improvement of the sugar-insulin action.  For individuals with a BMI 35 or less, we observed lower weight loss with the malabsortive procedures, but the metabolic effect remained the same as seen in heavier patients.  This indicates that the procedures are very effective for improving blood sugar levels.  In the Gastric Sleeve, the effect is related to the removal of 80% of the stomach. 

Both obese patients and those with Type 2 Diabetes should discuss with the surgeon each procedure’s surgical risk, the rate of bariatric and metabolic effect, and the long-term co-morbidities that each surgical option has before deciding on any of them.

Dr. Arturo Rodriguez
http://www.thebariatric.com

Originally posted 2008-05-19 19:15:45. Republished by Blog Post Promoter

Did you like this? If so, please bookmark it,
tell a friend
about it, and subscribe to the blog RSS feed.

De-Banding the LapBand Can be Complicated

Wednesday, August 3rd, 2011

De-Banding the Lap Band Can be Complicated

Today I want to share some concepts that frequently are misunderstood by Doctors starting a bariatric program, and by Banded Patients.  There are several reasons for De-Banding a Lap-Band patient. Today I would like to focus on EROSION.  The incidence of Stomach Erosion ranges from 2 to 15% of the patients who underwent a Lap Band Procedure .  The occurence of erosion depends on the Surgeons learning curve, and various patient actions such as the consumption of alcohol, spicy or hot food, frequent vomiting or the use of some medications like Aspirin.

The concept I want to strongly point out is that De-banding due to stomach erosion could be much more challenging and difficult than the initial LAP BAND procedure itself, and requires a lot more experience and skills to do it safely and properly without having complications like leaking, intra-abdominal abscesses or infection at different levels.

Doing the De-Banding properly also means that the Surgeon has to keep in mind that the patient may require a Revision Surgery after six months, for a Re-banding, a Gastric sleeve or a Gastric Bypass Procedure.

In cases of infection or leaking during the De-Banding, the revision surgery will be very difficult, and prone to more frequent complication rates (5 to 30%), or may almost be impossible to be done because of heavy adhesions at the operatory site.  As a matter of fact, the so called “learning curve” among Doctors when doing a De-Banding procedure requires a larger number of “supervised surgeries” than with the initial lap band, and the supervisions are usually done by an experienced Surgeon teaching the new bariatric surgeons or the General Surgeons under these conditions, to provide an opportunity for those patients to receive a new bariatric procedure.

If you require De-banding, be sure to inform yourself and look into finding the most experienced and qualified surgeon.  Your health is important.

Dr. Arturo Rodriguez
Bariatric Surgeon

http://www.thebariatric.com

Originally posted 2008-04-28 13:27:42. Republished by Blog Post Promoter

Did you like this? If so, please bookmark it,
tell a friend
about it, and subscribe to the blog RSS feed.

What If my Bariatric Procedure Fails?

Tuesday, September 28th, 2010

What If my Bariatric Procedure Fails?

Patients can have minor or large complications after a Lap Band, Gastric sleeve or Gastric Bypass procedure.  Many patients may need another surgery to correct the complications, which can cost them more money. However,  medical complications are not always a result of a bariatric procedure failure.  A Weight Loss Procedure is classified as a failure if the procedure is no longer working.

When a Bariatric Procedure Fails for a patient, there are several different consequences to be considered.  They include the emotional, economical, and physical impacts of the failure.  

What are the emotional consequences of Procedure Failure?

Depending on the type of procedure (Lap Band, Gastric Sleeve or Gastric Bypass), the patient may regain all the weight back again. This can be emotionally devastating because it gives the patient the feeling that he or she has thrown away money for nothing.  They feel anger towards the doctor and themselves, and during this whole process, their health and life could be at risk due to the complications. It is important for patients to know they are not alone. It is also important that they take positive action to address the situation, since this increases the probability of succeeding in the future. 

 What happens after a Procedure Failure?

We can say a Bariatric Procedure is no longer working when the patient has regained all the weight originally lost. This means that the patient needs a new procedure called Revision Surgery. The need for a revision surgery after a procedure has failed may jeopardize the health or life of the patient, as the complication rate increases from 2% to 25%. In addition, it will cost additional money for the revision surgery.

The chances for success for a second, different, Bariatric Surgery are lower then the first time, and the morbidity increases up to 25% depending on the revision procedure to be done. This is in part because the doctor has to be able to finish a new Weight Loss Procedure over the scar tissue and be able to repair what went wrong in the first place. The decision as to which will be the chosen bariatric surgery for the second time will depend on the type of surgery first performed.

How can a patient succeed after Revision surgery?

The patient must be careful to avoid any mistakes made before that may have influenced the development of complications.  It is very important that you ask your doctor and yourself questions like:

  • Why didn’t the first procedure work for me?
  • Which procedure works for me best after failing the first time?
  • Am I going to be able to follow the rules for success with the procedure I am choosing?
  • How much help will I get from the doctor and his staff after revision surgery?
  • Am I looking only for the best price I can get, or for the procedure that can work best for me?

You have to analyze both the pros and cons for any procedure that you are considering, especially when considering a second procedure or revision surgery. You have more chances to succeed if you keep in mind what went wrong the first time, in order to develop a plan for success in the future.

 

Arturo Rodríguez, MD

http://www.thebariatric.com/

http://www.bandstersforum.com/

Originally posted 2008-07-27 21:53:21. Republished by Blog Post Promoter

Did you like this? If so, please bookmark it,
tell a friend
about it, and subscribe to the blog RSS feed.

What is the Best Surgical Weight Loss Procedure for Me?

Monday, September 6th, 2010

What is the Best Surgical Weight Loss Procedure for Me?

I hear this question all the time and there is no single answer for every person. You have to find your own answer by asking some questions like:

Is the cost of the procedure an issue that will influence my decision on which procedure to have?
Am I looking for a simple or complex bariatric procedure?
Am I looking for the safest procedure?
Am I going to be able to follow the rules for success with the procedure I am choosing?
How much help will I get from the doctor and his staff after any of the Weight Loss Procedures?
Which of the Weight Loss Procedure fits my life style better? 

You have to be well informed about all the surgical Weight Loss Options in order to have the answers, but it is also very important for you to know about the doctors that perform the surgies (the Lap Band, Gastric Sleeve or Gastric Bypass), their bariatric experience, their surgical staff, the experience they have in revision surgeries, the ethics and professionalism of the promoters and the Weight Loss follow up and support  that they will provide for you after your surgery.

Helpful Facts About Weight Loss Surgery

  • There is no ideal Weight Loss Procedure that works for every person.  Everyday we do more revision surgeries because of Lap Band, Gastric Sleeve and Gastric Bypass failures.
  • Gastric Sleeve is the Weight Loss Procedure that results in the best response for patients with Type 2 Diabetes, Hypertension and Hyper-Cholesterol (the Metabolic Effect).
  • The Lap band is the simpler and cheapest among the Weight Loss Procedures.
  • It is not true that if you are very heavy you will need to have the most drastic procedure.
  • Young or elderly patients can have the Lap Band, the Gastric Sleeve or the Gastric Bypass.
  • The doctor’s experience influences the outcome of the Weight Loss Procedures.
  • The patient´s eating behavior can modify the outcome of any of the Weight Loss Procedures.
  • The open message boards have very many doctors’ coordinators trying to send patients their way and might confused patient’s right decisions.}
  •  The procedure with lowest surgical risk is the Lap Band.
  • The procedure with the most surgical risk is the Duodenal Switch, followed by the Gastric Bypass.
  • The average hospital stay following the Lap Band procedure is one night.
  • The average hospital stay following the Gastric Sleeve procedure is two nights.
  • The average hospital stay following the Gastric Bypass procedure is three nights.
  • The Lap band needs to be “filled” periodically in order to provide optimum weight loss results.
  • A person with a Gastric Bypass will need nutritional supplements for life to avoid deficiencies.
  • You should avoid alcohol with any bariatric procedure, due to high risk of getting an ulcer.

 

Dr. Arturo Rodriguez
Bariatric Surgeon
http://www.thebariatric.com
http://www.bandstersforum.com

Originally posted 2008-06-26 00:34:53. Republished by Blog Post Promoter

Did you like this? If so, please bookmark it,
tell a friend
about it, and subscribe to the blog RSS feed.

Obesity: Surgery as a Weight Loss Option

Monday, July 12th, 2010

Obesity: Surgery as a Weight Loss Option

Obesity: Health Risks

Morbid obesity is a disease of excess energy stores in the form of fat (BMI >40 kg/m2).  Being overweight is associated with many physical problems which are now well recognized in both the medical community and general population.  Serious consequences of severe obesity are well documented and include cardiac dysfunction, pulmonary problems, digestive diseases, and endocrine disorders as well as obstetric, orthopedic, and dermatologic complications.  Obesity is also linked to an increased prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors known as Metabolic Syndrome. These include Hypertension, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Hypertriglyceridemia, Hyperinsulinemia and low levels of high density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol.

The risk for diabetes has been reported to be about twofold in the mildly obese, fivefold in moderately obese and tenfold in severely obese persons. The duration of obesity is also an important determinant of the risk for developing diabetes. The association between average weight of population groups and the prevalence of non-insulin-dependent diabetes has been repeatedly observed.

Cancer mortality rates are increased in severely obese females; e.g. endometrium (5.4 times), gallbladder (3.6 times), uterine cervix (2.4 times), ovary (1.6 times), breast (1.5 times). Cancer mortality rates are increased in severely obese males; e.g. colorectum (1.7 times), and prostate (1.3 times). The morbidly obese patient is also at risk for affective, anxiety and substance abuse disorders. People who are obese often consider their condition as a greater handicap than deafness, dyslexia or blindness.

Managing Obesity: What are the Options?

For people that are overweight or obese, weight loss can results in significant improvements to their health and decrease the risks for developing many long-term chronic diseases.   Statistically significant improvements have been observed in both diabetes and hypertension, with >10 percent weight loss, and in cardiovascular conditions, with only a 5 percent weight loss of overall body fat for overweight patients.

Generally, the first option for weight loss is a change in diet and exercise.  Many people have had success when sticking to a realistic plan and making permanent lifestyle changes.  However, for those that have struggled with morbid obesity, diet and exercise may not be sufficient to see the degree of change that they require in order to improve their overall health and achieve a healthy weight.

The use of anorectic medications has recently been advocated as a long term therapeutic modality in management of what is clearly a chronic disease. In a nearly four year study, utilizing a two drug regimen of Phentermine and Fenfluramine, behavior modification, diet and exercise, the initial optimistic results have not been sustained, with a one third drop-out rate and a final average weight loss of only three pounds in those who were followed for the four years of the study. This drug combination appears to have an unacceptably high association with cardiac valvular disease and has been withdrawn from therapeutic use because of these potentially life threatening sequelae.

Bariatric Surgery

Published scientific reports document that non-operative methods alone have not been effective in achieving a medically significant long term weight loss in severely obese adults. It has been shown that the majority of patients regain all the weight lost over the next five years.

For people who have exhausted other options such as diet and exercise, Bariatric Surgery may be medically necessary to achieve long term weight control for the morbidly obese. Bariatric surgery involves reducing the size of the gastric reservoir, with or without a degree of associated malabsorption. This can assist patient to improve their eating behaviors dramatically, which reduces caloric intake and ensures that the patient practices behavior modification by eating small amounts slowly, and chewing each mouthful well.

Success of bariatric surgical treatment must begin with realistic goals and progress through the best possible use of well designed and tested operations. These have been worked out over the last thirty years, and are now standardized, clearly defined procedures, with well recognized and documented outcome results including the Lap Band, Gastric Sleeve, Gastric Bypass and Duodenal Switch.

Prevention of secondary complications of morbid obesity is an important goal of management. The biological basis for morbid obesity is unknown, though recent work has demonstrated a genetic component of between 25 and 50%. Several studies confirm the influence of genetically determined proteins produced by the fat cell to be among the many mechanisms which have a place in the control of satiety. These studies confirm that morbid obesity is a disease, not a disorder of willpower, as sometimes implied. The physiological, biochemical and genetic evidence is overwhelming that morbid obesity is a complex disorder. Contributing causes include family history, environmental, cultural, socioeconomic and psychological factors.

Is Bariatric Surgery for Anyone?

The option of surgical treatment should be offered to patients who are morbidly obese, well informed, motivated, and acceptable operative risks. The patient should be able to participate in treatment and long term follow-up. A decision to elect surgical treatment requires an assessment of the risk and benefit in each case. Increased abdominal fat or “central obesity” (apple shaped as opposed to pear shaped or “external obesity”) is an important risk factor associated with the major complications of obesity.

Functional impairments associated with obesity are also important deciding factors for surgical treatment. Patients whose BMI exceeds 40 are potential candidates for surgery if they strongly desire substantial weight loss, because obesity severely impairs the quality of their lives. They must clearly and realistically understand how their lives may change after any of the operations.

In the USA and under certain circumstances, less severely obese patients (with BMI’s between 35 and 40) also may be considered for surgery, and in Mexico, patients with BMI 30 or more are considered for surgery. Included in this category are patients with high risk co-morbidities such as life-threatening cardiopulmonary problems (e.g. severe sleep apnea, Pickwickian syndrome, obesity-related cardiomyopathy, or severe diabetes mellitus). Other possible indications for patients with BMI’s between 35 and 40 include obesity-induced physical problems that are interfering with lifestyle (e.g. musculoskeletal, neurological, or body size problems precluding or severely interfering with employment, family function and ambulation).

Available published series report that the immediate operative mortality rate for Vertical Banded Gastroplasty, Roux-en-y Gastric Bypass and Lap band is relatively low.  Morbidity in the early postoperative period (i.e. wound infections, dehiscence, leaks from staple breakdown, stomal stenosis, marginal ulcers, various pulmonary problems, and deep thrombophlebitis) may be as high as ten percent or more. Splenectomy is necessary in 0.3% of patients to control operative bleeding. However, the aggregate risk of the most serious complications of gastrointestinal leak and deep venous thrombosis is less than one per cent. In the late postoperative period, other problems may arise and may require reoperation. The mortality and morbidity rates of reoperation are higher (30%) than those of primary operations.

Complications and Risks of Bariatric Surgery

The most frequent “major” complications for bypass patients were GI leak (0.73%), GI hemorrhage or bleeding (0.44%), and small bowel obstruction (0.40%). Simple restrictive procedures (vertical banded gastroplasty, Gastric sleeve) with no bypass were reported to have GI leak (0.47%) and stoma obstruction or stenosis (0.35%) as the most frequent defined major complication. Lap band does not show leaking.

Risk and efficacy of operations for obesity must be understood in the context that severe obesity is a chronic, frequently progressive, life threatening disease. The therapeutic program applied should be designed to be beneficial throughout the patient’s lifetime. Long term follow-up is essential when reporting treatment effectiveness. Weight loss usually reaches a maximum between 18 and 24 months postoperatively. Mean percent excess weight loss at five years ranges from 48 to 74 % after gastric bypass and from 50 to 60% after vertical banded gastroplasty.

Pure gastric restrictive procedures such as vertical banded gastroplasty (VBG), silastic ring gastroplasty (SRG) and adjustable silastic gastric banding (AGB or LAPBAND) all achieve weight loss by restricting volume of intake. Intake becomes a function of the patient’s motivation to chew well and eat slowly. Failure to do so may result in repeated vomiting and isolated cases of protein and vitamin deficiency have been reported in these circumstances. Careful patient follow up is therefore mandatory, with particular emphasis on the first three postoperative months. Adjustable silastic gastric banding (LAPBAND) approved in 2001 for use in the USA following FDA trials can be considered functionally similar to vertical banded gastroplasty.

Gastric bypass with Roux-en-y (RGB) results in ingested food bypassing the gastric fundus, body, antrum, duodenum and a variable length of proximal jejunum. In consequence, these patients are at risk to develop iron deficiency secondary to lack of contact of food iron with gastric acid and consequent reduced conversion of iron from the relatively insoluble ferrous to the more absorbable ferric form. In addition, vitamin B12 deficiency may result in consequence of food no longer coming in contact with gastric intrinsic factor. Vitamin D and calcium absorption may also be reduced since the duodenum and proximal jejunum, which are the preferential sites of absorption, are bypassed by this procedure. Life long supplements of multivitamins, vitamin B12 iron and calcium are mandatory following this procedure. Long-term follow-up is essential for physical, nutritional and metabolic evaluation.

Weight Loss: Benefits

Weight loss surgery has been reported to improve several comorbid conditions such as glucose intolerance and frank diabetes mellitus, sleep apnea and obesity associated hypoventilation, hypertension, and serum lipid abnormalities.  A recent study showed that Type II diabetics treated medically had a mortality rate three times that of a comparable group who underwent gastric bypass surgery. Benefits also include increased ambulation, and decreased incidence of clinical depression, among a wide variety of improvements on a long-term basis.

 

Arturo Rodriguez, MD

http://www.thebariatric.com

http://www.bandstersforum.com

Originally posted 2008-11-23 21:08:52. Republished by Blog Post Promoter

Did you like this? If so, please bookmark it,
tell a friend
about it, and subscribe to the blog RSS feed.

Bariatric Procedures: Being More than Fans

Monday, June 28th, 2010

Bariatric Procedures: Being More than Fans

The last 10 years I have been very busy participating in a lot of meetings around the world.  I have found, unfortunately, that we have spent such a long time discussing what procedures are the best for treating obesity that we have forgotten the main point, the core of any of the procedures’ success: the patient.

We all look like fans of a football team, cheering for their favorite team.  Some doctors cheer for the Gastric bypass as the best and only option to cure obesity. Then we have the doctors that prefer the lapband as the first option. In another corner, there are the doctors that promote the Gastric sleeve as the new treatment for obesity and Type 2 Diabetes.

There are several good medical reasons involved in the doctor’s preferences for one procedure over the other but also their preferences points toward which procedure the doctor feels more comfortable performing or is more skilful.  In Mexico, we have to add to this discussion, the place were the doctor was trained, for instance, if he was trained in the Mexican Health Care System they will know very little about the Lap band and would prefer to perform the Gastric Sleeve or the Gastric Bypass.  This is because the Lap band is not yet available for the government hospitals.  This means that these doctors started with Bariatric procedures such as the Gastric Bypass 3-4 years ago, and the Gastric Sleeve 1-2 years ago.

I personally recommend the Lap band as the first option. There is less risk for operatory complications involved, it is less expensive and it’s adjustable.   You don’t have to be overly obese to have the Lap Band.  You can have Lap band revision in case the lapband fails the first time or jump to any of the other procedures available including the Duodenal Switch. The Lap-band also helps in the control of co-morbidities related to obesity such as high blood pressure or Diabetes in almost 6 out of 10 patients.

The arguments against having the Lap band as the first option are valid with patients that have difficult behavioral control such as alcohol abuse. Arguments are also valid for patients that don’t like the idea of having lapband fills done periodically or when there isn’t a doctor or center to do the fills close to where they live.  The arguments against the Lapband that are not valid, are erosion rates (less than 2 %), slippage (less than 4 %), or obtaining insufficient weight loss as a strong argument for deciding on other surgical options such as the Gastric sleeve or Gastric Bypass.

There are no “complication free” bariatric procedures.  With any bariatric procedure there are advantages and disadvantages.  We also found that with all bariatric procedures, there is a chance for insufficient weight loss and a chance that patients may need revision surgery. Mean percent excess weight loss at five years ranged from 48 to 74 % after Gastric Bypass and from 50 to 60% after Vertical Banded Gastroplasty, the same results are for the Gastric Sleeve.

However, with all this in mind, we must remember that the best and most effective procedure will ultimately depend on the individual patient that is looking for a weight loss procedure.  The patient and doctor must work together to discover all the facts and make the best informed decision in order to be successful. Don´t rush your decision – get informed!

 

Arturo Rodríguez, MD

http://www.thebariatric.com

http://www.bandstersforum.com

Originally posted 2008-11-13 22:11:41. Republished by Blog Post Promoter

Did you like this? If so, please bookmark it,
tell a friend
about it, and subscribe to the blog RSS feed.

Vertical Gastrectomy Procedures

Saturday, January 9th, 2010

Vertical Gastrectomy Procedures

The original procedure, conceived by Dr. D. Johnston in England, was called The Magenstrasse and Mill Operation. The stomach is stapled vertically and divided from the incisura angularis to reach the angle of His at the gastric fundus. Dr. Johnston’s procedure of leaving a long gastric tube that resembles the German highway Magenstrasse was rapidly called that way.  The Magenstrasse, or “street of the stomach“, is a long tube fashioned from the lesser curvature of the stomach, which conveys food from the esophagus to the antral Mill without the total partition of the stomach.  The normal antral grinding of solid food and neuro-hormonal, antro-pyloric-duodenal regulation of gastric emptying and secretion are preserved.

It is now called the Vertical Sleeve Gastrectomy (VSG) but is also known as Vertical Gastroplasty. If a silastic ring or mesh is added to the technique, it is called the Vertical Banded Gastroplasty (VBG) and was suggested to help increase the restriction needed for a better weight loss.  If a silastic ring is added to the pouch of a Gastric Bypass, it is called the Fobi-Capella Procedure.

These techniques (VSG and VBG) generate weight loss by restricting the amount of food that can be eaten (Purely Restrictive Procedure) without having any bypass of the intestines or malabsorption. Both procedures have largely been abandoned due to poor long term results.

The more popular procedure known today as the Gastric Sleeve (much longer “street” than the Magenstrasse procedure) is done laparoscopically and is considered a variation of the Vertical Gastrectomy, but includes the removal of the remaining 80% of the stomach after its partition.

I met Dr. Gagner several years ago, a very friendly Canadian doctor that was living in NY and then moved later to Miami.  He is considered among bariatric surgeons as one of the fathers of the Gastric Sleeve (GS) as a primary procedure and told me that the success of the procedure was largely discovered by accident because no one expected the remarkable weight loss produced by the Gastric Sleeve.  Later medical scientific publications revealed that the driving force for the weight loss was the decreased level of Ghrelin Factor when removing the 80% of the stomach.

 GASTRIC SLEEVE Advantages:

  • Stomach volume is considerably reduced to more than 100 cc but not as much as compared to the pouch of the Lap band (15 cc) or the Gastric Bypass (30 cc).
  • The Sleeve motility gradually returns to normal functioning after 3 months following the operation, so most regular foods can then be consumed but in smaller amounts. 
  • The procedure eliminates the portion of the stomach that produces the Ghrelin Factor (the hormone that stimulates hunger).  By avoiding the intestinal bypass, the chance of intestinal obstruction (blockage), anemia, osteoporosis, protein deficiency and vitamin deficiency are eliminated.
  • Very safe and effective as a Primary procedure, First Stage procedure for very high BMI patients or as a Revisional procedure.
  • Can be checked with a scope when needed.
  • Appealing option for people with existing anemia, Crohn’s disease, arthritis and numerous other conditions that make them too high risk for intestinal bypass procedures.
  • Success rate is 60-80% of excess weight loss.
  • Proven to work better on Type 2 Diabetes and on Metabolic Disease than other procedures because increases in the Incretins secretion which lower the sugar Insulin resistance.
  • It can be converted to almost any other weight loss procedure.

GASTRIC SLEEVE Disadvantages:

  • Poor patient cooperation will result in inadequate weight loss or weight regain like binging eaters.
  • Patients with a high BMI often need to have a second stage procedure later to lose all the remaining extra weight.
  • Two stages is safer and more effective than one operation for high BMI patients.
  • Soft and liquid calories from ice cream, milk shakes, chocolates, etc., can be absorbed and slows down the weight loss.
  • This procedure does involve stomach cutting and stapling and therefore leaks and other complications related to cutting and stapling may occur.
  • It is not a reversible procedure.
  • Considered investigational by some surgeons and insurance companies.

Arturo Rodríguez, MD.

http://www.thebariatric.com

Originally posted 2008-09-05 01:09:58. Republished by Blog Post Promoter

Did you like this? If so, please bookmark it,
tell a friend
about it, and subscribe to the blog RSS feed.